Report of the Interception of Communications Commissioner - March 2015

Figure 4 Breakdown of Interception Errors

stored communication
acquired w/o
lawful authority

implementation of warrant

7

%

no lawful
authority

8%

excess
data
2%

unauthorised selection /
examination

5%

13%
safeguards
breaches

36%
incorrect
communications
address

17%

8%
8%
7%

25%

incorrect
dissemination

over-collection

unauthorised
disclosure

failure to
cancel interception

6.81 Through our audits we have in a number of specific cases recommended that
interception warrants should be modified or cancelled, we have required changes to
operational practices or procedures to safeguard privacy, or have required additional
information to be provided to the Secretary of State or Senior Official in submissions.
More broadly the recommendations made in relation to the application process have
improved compliance and the clarity and quality of the necessity and proportionality
justifications. Those made in relation to the section 15/16 safeguards have strengthened
or tightened a number of the procedures for the retention, storage, dissemination and
destruction of the intercepted material or related communications data.

38

‌ @iocco_oversight

Select target paragraph3