Surveillance Oversight Database

and the independent Interception of Communications Commissioner (“the IC Commissioner”). Furthermore, it itself was in a position to provide oversight, having access to

Intelligence Inspectorate Instructions Ordinance), which are made available to the public. Furthermore, if the Inspectorate notices potential crimes, it shall report the matter

of locus standi, which it considers to be excessively difficult to satisfy. Furthermore, according to the findings of the referring court, the NSA’s activities based

communication affected, the persons concerned and the chosen duration of retention. Furthermore, national authorities’ access to the retained data must be conditional and

family relationships, private communications and, potentially, their most intimate thoughts. Furthermore, the logging of keystrokes, tracking of locations, covert photography, and video

direct access to the FRA’s databases to conduct their own free searches. Furthermore, while the information made available to the analysts through direct access

includes the freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information. Furthermore, the Convention confirms that the exercise of the right to data protection

conduct of individuals who may pose an immediate threat to public order. 65 Furthermore, the technique provided for in Article L. 851‑3 of the CSI makes it

national security, but also to other public authorities, depending on their needs. Furthermore, that judgment concerned a criminal investigation, not national security. 25

Commission, and if data subjects have enforceable rights and effective legal remedies.3 Furthermore, the GDPR details the conditions under which such a transfer may take place

fundamental rights to respect for private life and to the protection of personal data. Furthermore, the fact that data are retained and subsequently used without the 1 Directive

adhere to it, and United States public authorities are not themselves subject to it. Furthermore, national security, public interest and law enforcement requirements of the United States

secrets, which are not based upon statutory provisions, shall remain unchanged. Furthermore, transfer shall not take place if material security interests of the Federal

that that information alone allows the data subject to be identified. 42. Furthermore, recital 26 of Directive 95/46 states that, to determine whether a person

in issue. That case concerned the retention of fingerprints and DNA records. Furthermore, the legislation in issue permitted that retention even in the case of

to date, been on the basis that there was a lack of adequate safeguards. Furthermore, it is clear from the IPT judgment that it is the position of Privacy

life and, consequently, the rights guaranteed by Article 7 of the Charter. Furthermore, such a retention of data also falls under Article 8 of the Charter

Special Immigration Appeal Commission. The Court said in paragraph 38: Page 39 “Furthermore, although it is for member states to take the appropriate measures to

any other restriction on the disclosure of information (however imposed).” 14. Furthermore: (a) s.19 does not affect the duties imposed by the information gateway

legal obligations of the communicating body are not contrary to this. 5.2.ii. Furthermore, communication to other public bodies is exceptionally permissible if, in a

Court, the Supreme Administrative Court or the National Social Security Court. Furthermore, with regard to decisions of lower authorities, such as the National Police

work to ensure that these are in place, and that they are observed. Furthermore, any attempt to get round the procedures which provide for legal interception

that time was therefore merely focused on the States belonging to the Warsaw Pact. Furthermore, owing to technical progress it had become possible to identify the telephone connections

it is really appropriate, and only appropriate, for the legislature to do. Furthermore, I find it hard to see what there is in the present case to

in the form and subject to the interpretation decided by the Constitutional Court. Furthermore, the Government of the Federal Republic of Germany were prompted by this judgment

with the principle of legal clarity under the rule of law. The legislator must furthermore observe the principle of proportionality. It must also put in place organisational

BVerfGE 90, 286 <360>). 136 d) The right to collect evidence is furthermore limited by state interests of the Federation or of a German Land (welfare

standards in the statute, and that the courts can carry out judicial review. Furthermore, the clarity and determinedness of the provision ensure that the person concerned

principles protected by the Basic Law] which would have the same effect. Furthermore, the regulation violates Article 2.1 in conjunction with Article 1.1 of the

were not required to first have recourse to the ordinary courts. […] 79 Furthermore, due to the current case-law of the administrative courts, legal protection