CNCTR Annual Report 2023
Document contents
arrêts rendus par la grande chambre de la Cour le 25 mai 2021 (Big Brother Watch et autres c. Royaume-Uni50 et Centrum för rättvisa c. Suède51) relatifs
Reports
CNCTR Annual Report 2022
Document contents
européenne des droits de l’homme (CEDH) L’un des apports de l’arrêt Big Brother Watch et autres contre Royaume-Uni50 rendu par la grande chambre de la Cour
Reports
Report on the activity of the Parliamentary Delegation for Intelligence for the year 2021-2022
Document contents
par la Cour européenne des droits de l’Homme (CEDH) dans ses arrêts Big Brother Watch et autres c. Royaume-Uni, et Centrum för rättvisa c. Suède, de mars
Reports
CNCTR Annual Report 2021
Document contents
- Voir le point 424 de l’arrêt Big Brother Watch. 47 - Voir le point 350 de l’arrêt Big Brother Watch 48 - La Cour a déterminé que pour
Reports
Report on the activity of the Parliamentary Delegation for Intelligence for the year 2020-2021
Document contents
les services étrangers. Par deux arrêts du 25 mai 2021 (n° 58170/13, Big Brother Watch et autres) et du 19 juin 2018 (n° 35252/08, Centrum för rättvisa
Reports
Impact Study of the Bill on the Prevention of Terrorism and Intelligence
Document contents
l’accès et de l’examen de données de connexion dans son arrêt Big Brother Watch. Et a. c. Royaume-Uni (n° 58170/13). Elle a jugé en l’espèce
Reports
Big Brother Watch and others v. United Kingdom (Grand Chamber Judgment)
Related document(s)
Big Brother Watch v. UK (First Section Judgment)
Case law
Surveillance by intelligence services: fundamental rights safeguards and remedies in the EU Volume II: field perspectives and legal update
Document contents
pending cases: ECtHR, Centrum För Rättvisa v. Sweden, No. 35252/08; ECtHR, Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom, No. 58170/13; ECtHR, Bureau of Investigative
Reports
Report of the Bulk Powers Review
Document contents
may The Executive Committee of DSOU consists of Article 19, Liberty, Big Brother Watch, Open Rights Group, English Pen and Privacy International. Affiliates are
Reports
CNCTR Annual Report 2020
Document contents
affaires devrait intervenir après celui rendu en Grande chambre dans l’affaire Big Brother Watch (évoqué ci-dessous). Aucune indication précise de calendrier n’est disponible à
Reports
White Paper on Internal Security
Document contents
enquête sur les phénomènes de complotisme, IFOP Fondation Jean Jaurès, Conspiracy Watch, Enquête sur le complotisme, février 2019 : 28% des 18-24 ans adhèrent
Reports
Centrum för Rättvisa v. Sweden (Grand Chamber Judgment)
Document contents
the case should be assigned to the same Grand Chamber as the case of Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom (nos. 58170/13 and 2 others) (Rules 24,
Case law
Investigatory Powers Commissioner's Office 2019 Annual Report
Document contents
these powers. 9 10 Investigatory Powers Commissioner’s Annual Report 2019 Big Brother Watch – claim to the European Court of Human Rights 2.11 In our 2018
Reports
R Bridge v CC South Wales and ors (High Court)
Document contents
A stipulation that watch lists should be “proportionate and necessary” for each deployment and primary factors for the inclusion on watch lists include will
Case law
R Bridges v CC South Wales and ors (Court of Appeal)
Document contents
software developed by NEC (now North Gate Public Services (UK) Ltd) called “NeoFace Watch software”. 11. SWP uses AFR in two ways. We are concerned in this appeal
Case law
Paton v Poole Borough Council
Document contents
other occasions the surveillance was conducted from a parked car in order to watch who was getting in or out of the Complainants’ car. During the period
Case law
B v Security Service
Document contents
is contended that the system of holding of personal data is a similar "Big Brother" menace, which, like the system for the interception of communications, constitutes
Case law
The British Irish Rights Watch and ors v Security Services and ors
Related document(s)
Big Brother Watch v. UK (First Section Judgment)
Case law
Privacy International v SSFCA and ors (No 1)
Document contents
as explained in paragraphs 49 to 63 of our Judgment in Human Rights Watch & Ors v Secretary of State for the Foreign & Commonwealth Office &
Case law
Report on the activity of the Parliamentary Delegation for Intelligence for the year 2019-2020
Document contents
convention européenne de sauvegarde des droits de l’homme. Dans un arrêt Big Brother Watch c/ Royaume Uni du 13 septembre 2018, la CEDH s’est en effet prononcée
Reports
Privacy International v United Kingdom
Document contents
brought into force by regulations. For a detailed overview of the IPA see Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom, (nos. 58170/13, 62322/14 and 24960/15, §§
Case law
Zakharov v Russia
Document contents
Code: the first concerned the selling of espionage equipment, namely pens and watches with built-in cameras, while the second concerned the covert hacking of a
Case law
Kennedy v United Kingdom
Document contents
the applicant's case together with a case involving a complaint by British-Irish Rights Watch and others in which a similar challenge to the IPT's Rules was made (see paragraphs
Case law
Liberty v United Kingdom
Document contents
Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by Liberty, British Irish Rights Watch and the Irish Council for Civil Liberties, a British and two Irish civil liberties’
Case law
Silver v United Kingdom
Document contents
Around May 1974, Mrs. Colne began correspondence with a Mr. Michael Williams, the brother of an imprisoned friend of hers. Mr. Williams was then detained in H.M. Prison
Case law
Malone v United Kingdom
Document contents
is to prevent the establishment of systems and methods that would allow "Big Brother" to become master of the citizen’s private life. For it is just
Case law
BND Law (Judgment)
Document contents
in the state against which the applications were directed (cf. ECtHR, Big Brother Watch and Others v. the United Kingdom, Judgment of 13 September 2018, no
Case law
Automated lincence plate control in Bavaria
Document contents
persons are conducted in a public space, may solicit the feeling of being watched. The weight of the interference inherent in this measure is not mitigated
Case law
Data retention
Document contents
without cause is capable of creating a diffusely threatening feeling of being watched which can impair a free exercise of fundamental rights in many areas. b)
Case law
Investigatory Powers Commissioner's Office 2018 Annual Report
Document contents
Big Brother Watch judgment 2.42 On 13 September 2018, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) handed down its judgment in Big Brother Watch v
Reports