and proportionately “intercepted and selected for examination pursuant to
s.8(4) of RIPA” but that “the procedure laid down by GCHQ’s internal
policies for selection of the communications for examination was in error
not followed in this case.” The IPT determined that this breach also
constituted “a breach of the Claimant’s Article 8 rights.” The IPT further
determined that as “no record was retained, there is no cause for any order
for destruction.”
125.
The IPT held that “no determination” was made with respect to the
remaining eight Applicants.
126.
On 1 July 2015, the IPT notified the Applicants that the finding relating
to the Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights “in fact related to Amnesty
International Ltd”. The IPT provided no explanation for the error in its
published judgment.
50